Hi,
I am no expert, but having explored it a bit, I would say that microlearning is not so much a short lesson like how to fix a toilet valve. Rather, microlearning is a tool you can use to engage learners differently and regularly. Currently, I have two ideas for using it in two very different situations. Both will use other methods of content delivery together with microlessons delivered via apps so that people can view them on their mobile devices. Each microlesson in each case comprises about 5 questions with feedback or a very short video or some other burst of content with a chance to interact and some kind of feedback. The key is to have just one very focused learning objective, which generally means that the lesson is not complete in and of itself... it depends on other microlessons or more traditional classes or independent study to form a complete "class" if you will.
What interest me about microlearning is the way it can be used to engage learners on a regular basis, feeding content to them in tiny, digestible chunks that help them absorb it. Because the lessons and short and engaging the way, say online quizzes on Facebook or quick games of solitaire are engaging, I believe they can be very attractive to people who have limited time or mindshare for engaging on a topic.
A great example of this is Duo Lingo (a free online language course and free app for your mobile device). It is flexible, focused and fun, but really helps you learn and practice languages. I have seen other examples of microlearning that I don't particularly like, but I have heard good things from people about them... things like lame little quizzes on specific topics or mini lessons followed by a couple of questions...
I would not consider the course commons a form of microlearning. I'd be interested to hear what others have to say about that.
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.