Celebrate Excellence in Education: Nominate Outstanding Educators by April 15!
higher education #easy navigation #student learning #course navigation
We're piloting Canvas currently and are somewhat disappointed by the experience of feeling lost in a course. We're looking for workarounds. The absence of breadcrumbs and being able to "bookmark" or "save" the page to return to later on are just a couple of needed features.
We're telling faculty to point students to the Modules "page" to orient themselves, to ensure links open in new windows/tabs so students don't get kicked out of the course, and to name pages and modules keeping in mind this navigation issue.
Any other workarounds you've heard of?
Solved! Go to Solution.
saurilio Some of my favorite navigation strategies to improve student user experience UX/UI:
Convincing
Ahh...convincing. @fowleste The way I convinced myself took 3 1/2 years of intense and tedious customer service for faculty/courses seeing the same issues, repeatedly and having to puzzle through them, repeatedly. I wouldn't wish that learning experience on anyone, though it was certainly convincing for me. I'm still providing support as I design though I like to manage upstream now, when possible.
I've also said, (in other posts such as More Reasons #5 at the bottom) that it is excruciating to watch videos of a new user struggling with a Canvas course you've designed when the navigation seems so obvious! Nope. That is painfully personal UX and the teacher in me can't live with knowing that course design itself can be an obstacle to learning. Not every action that seems kind is really kind. (This is why I recommend doing the personal pre-work of quality control on Modules, making sure every assignment, content page, link, due date, and quiz is present in the precise order you want students to experience them. Then you hide other navigation avenues that allow skipping. Make a homepage button that lands students exactly at the list view of modules, not inside a page, not with confusing options.)
Quote from the above-linked Syllabus tool post: "*Real-life experience: I was a student in a course where, at the end of week 3, over 1/3 of the class hadn't found the actual course content in Modules but they thought they had. 1/3 of the class had clicked on Assignments and Quizzes at the bottom of the Syllabus and attempted them without even knowing there was anything else to see! Fortunately or Unfortunately, only 1/3 of the good students followed the directions to read the Syllabus first, so only 1/3 were angry and betrayed by the experience."
The Tao of Rachael: Course content needs to be varied and interesting. Course navigation needs to be utterly predictable.
Caveat* Even terrible navigation will kind-of work if you do it the same way every time, in every course. Students only crash a few times and then they can potentially figure out the designer's misguided mental map and overcome it. Interesting, creative masterpieces of custom-coded navigation only prove the rule until they are scalable and maintainable by non-digital-native faculty.
Keep in mind these apples and oranges: When multiple formats are allowed for students to accomplish an assignment, that is a trendy, sensitive way for students to express themselves and remain vested in their work. When multiple navigation routes through materials are possible, that is a guarantee that some vital content will be missed.
I understand that not everyone will agree on what qualifies as simplicity on Canvas. For inspiration, I recommend you rely less on experienced teachers or those who consider themselves experienced Canvas users and instead talk with those who give daily tech support to lost students, angry faculty, and great courses that students mysteriously hate.
There is a chasm between what we think ought to work, and what really works. Sometimes we get "design bored" and try to add interest in the wrong ways. Sometimes we fight built-in Canvas features due to lack of understanding or lack of flexibility, creating unnecessary parallel features and failing to leverage existing tools that benefit students. Sometimes we get confused by hype (ie, the training industry loves to speculate that LMS and the next button are dead. They aren't higher ed., are they?)
Article: Why Simplicity Is So Incredibly Important In UX Design
"Explain it like I'm 5."--Credited to Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Dick Feynman
Quality Matters Rubric created to evaluate online courses only, but it still has a lot of Ah-ha moments for lecture courses too. QM is the best tool I've found so far.
saurilio Some of my favorite navigation strategies to improve student user experience UX/UI:
Rachel thank you for that amazing post! I am also of a UX mindset and I agree with everything you recommend.
I'm having a hard time convincing some that a Modules-based course does not need other options in the main Course Navigation, i.e.; Assignments, Quizzes, Discussions, Pages, etc. Users have come to expect Modules to contain all course content in chronological order, thus eliminating the need for redundant navigation links that clutter the UI. I believe Hicks law would support this.
Do you recommend any studies or references to help convince the naysayers?
Convincing
Ahh...convincing. @fowleste The way I convinced myself took 3 1/2 years of intense and tedious customer service for faculty/courses seeing the same issues, repeatedly and having to puzzle through them, repeatedly. I wouldn't wish that learning experience on anyone, though it was certainly convincing for me. I'm still providing support as I design though I like to manage upstream now, when possible.
I've also said, (in other posts such as More Reasons #5 at the bottom) that it is excruciating to watch videos of a new user struggling with a Canvas course you've designed when the navigation seems so obvious! Nope. That is painfully personal UX and the teacher in me can't live with knowing that course design itself can be an obstacle to learning. Not every action that seems kind is really kind. (This is why I recommend doing the personal pre-work of quality control on Modules, making sure every assignment, content page, link, due date, and quiz is present in the precise order you want students to experience them. Then you hide other navigation avenues that allow skipping. Make a homepage button that lands students exactly at the list view of modules, not inside a page, not with confusing options.)
Quote from the above-linked Syllabus tool post: "*Real-life experience: I was a student in a course where, at the end of week 3, over 1/3 of the class hadn't found the actual course content in Modules but they thought they had. 1/3 of the class had clicked on Assignments and Quizzes at the bottom of the Syllabus and attempted them without even knowing there was anything else to see! Fortunately or Unfortunately, only 1/3 of the good students followed the directions to read the Syllabus first, so only 1/3 were angry and betrayed by the experience."
The Tao of Rachael: Course content needs to be varied and interesting. Course navigation needs to be utterly predictable.
Caveat* Even terrible navigation will kind-of work if you do it the same way every time, in every course. Students only crash a few times and then they can potentially figure out the designer's misguided mental map and overcome it. Interesting, creative masterpieces of custom-coded navigation only prove the rule until they are scalable and maintainable by non-digital-native faculty.
Keep in mind these apples and oranges: When multiple formats are allowed for students to accomplish an assignment, that is a trendy, sensitive way for students to express themselves and remain vested in their work. When multiple navigation routes through materials are possible, that is a guarantee that some vital content will be missed.
I understand that not everyone will agree on what qualifies as simplicity on Canvas. For inspiration, I recommend you rely less on experienced teachers or those who consider themselves experienced Canvas users and instead talk with those who give daily tech support to lost students, angry faculty, and great courses that students mysteriously hate.
There is a chasm between what we think ought to work, and what really works. Sometimes we get "design bored" and try to add interest in the wrong ways. Sometimes we fight built-in Canvas features due to lack of understanding or lack of flexibility, creating unnecessary parallel features and failing to leverage existing tools that benefit students. Sometimes we get confused by hype (ie, the training industry loves to speculate that LMS and the next button are dead. They aren't higher ed., are they?)
Article: Why Simplicity Is So Incredibly Important In UX Design
"Explain it like I'm 5."--Credited to Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Dick Feynman
Quality Matters Rubric created to evaluate online courses only, but it still has a lot of Ah-ha moments for lecture courses too. QM is the best tool I've found so far.
Thank you Rachel, that was an incredible speedy and insightful response.
I too came to the absolute realization about the course navigation after a few years handling teacher/student support. It was very frustrating to hear the same issues of access and navigation again and again.
I do refer faculty to QM Standard 8.1 Course navigation facilitates ease of use. I argue students should just simply go to Modules to access their course content, start at the top and end at the bottom. Very simple. I would love QM to add an example to their annotations to support a minimalist approach to course navigation.
You use the word "skipping" to describe a student bypassing the Modules to access assessments. I haven't tried using that word yet, and it might resonate with some. I hope you don't mind if I steal your line "Course content needs to be varied and interesting. Course navigation needs to be utterly predictable." I'm not sure if you borrowed that from somewhere but that is a good one!
Please use that quote. My invented fortune cookie! Thanks.
Oh yes, Hicks law. Just re-read. Yes, there is a tendency to think that variety and multiple routes are a bonus, but it can backfire. It takes a lot of time, decisions, and explaining (cognitive burden) when that attention is needed for more urgent things, like the content!
In conducting Faculty trainings and teaching students, I came to realize that boredom and overwhelm can look similar on the faces of your audience. haha
(Too many choices can backfire, and Canvas navigation is one example. My analogy is that it is like taking a toddler to a huge ice cream store. You can end up with a lot of tears and tantrums, and nobody gets any ice cream. Depending on the overwhelm potential, sometimes it is better before you even go in to say, "You can have vanilla or strawberry.")
Stephen, So glad to hear you use QM. That rubric can really focus your efforts and do away with the worst course offenses.
I fell in love with QM because their first dozen items matched my personal support checklist that I assembled from frequently asked questions and my most common fixes offered during course support sessions. I feel like QM nailed it! So many common problems aren't a mystery anymore. The word is out.
Faculty spend tremendous effort to be the smartest person in the room with something to offer their students. Unfortunately, learning new software (like Canvas) has a way of making people feel stupid and nobody likes that. Rushing to fix the situation sometimes leads to missing the real problem or creating elaborate new ones.
Thanks so much Rachel for taking the time to provide such a comprehensive reply!
Hi Suzanne
We have looked at design tools that integrate with Canvas to improve the navigation and interface. Three we looked at were Crystal Delta, Everspring and CIDI Labs. All seem to improve the interface by supporting consistent page layout and navigation with icons, blocks, heading styles, banners.
One of the features CIDI Labs has is a modules menu that can automatically navigate to the first page of each module. This menu can be auto- generated but it would be better if you could set the style, colours and icons.
I have always wanted a page tracker that shows a learner where they are, what they have completed and clicking will take them to that page. I dont think the above tools have perfected this but they are close.
CIDI Labs tools can do a lot to help the visual layout of your content pages and quick building of repetitive elements of courses--if that is your greatest need. The improved page layout can inspire confidence your learners and add to your school's overall professionalism in courses that are already working well. (I have found these layout tools to be sadly lacking when it comes to helping instructors understand the student experience of their courses.)
*Caveat: You mentioned that Canvas is a new "pilot" experience for your school in your UX request. At this stage, your needs are not tied to a slick alternative layout or course building-speed. Early on, your school's design template is more successful if you understand exactly what each Canvas feature is built to do--and not do--and how it all fits together into a cohesive course. It is all too common for new users to get frustrated by missing information and accidentally fight the programmed Canvas features that already exist. In this stage, your instructional designers/faculty are building a mental map of the course layout.
It may be tempting to reinvent alternative navigation structures or tinker with the HTML. Instead, save your energy by collecting some example Canvas courses that work well using the existing built-in tools that *yay* can be maintained by the instructor without breaking any code or accidentally creating dead ends.
Hi Rachel
I responded to Suzanne without thoroughly reading your excellent advice in your first post. Yes - we are looking at two different requirements here. Firstly, instructional design (we tend to use the term learning design more in Australia) and secondly user interface design. There can be a lot of overlap, hence the need for a strong collaborative approach when determining a good course navigation experience for learners.
We have just found a few neat interactive feature in Canvas that allows an inline multiple choice question to check the learner's understanding. This can be set so that you need to answer it correctly before the Next button can be accessed at the bottom of the page.
We have just found a few neat interactive feature in Canvas that allows an inline multiple choice question to check the learner's understanding. This can be set so that you need to answer it correctly before the Next button can be accessed at the bottom of the page.
How do you access this feature ? thanks
I know that feature exists in CidiTools. It may also be possible in free H5P but I haven't tested that to see if it hides the next button until the knowledge check is completed.
An alternative in Canvas-only would be to set modules to require all items to be done in order. Then add a 2-3 questions quiz in the quiz tool with the name "Knowledge Check" at the end of each module.
CidiTools is a compatible software subscription from an outside company. I like CidiTools, and the quote below definitely applies:
"The first rule of any technology used in a business is that automation applied to an efficient operation will magnify the efficiency. The second is that automation applied to an inefficient operation will magnify the inefficiency."
HI Ian
Apologies for not answering earlier - Rachael is correct - this is a feature of Cidilabs Design Tools. It is working really well for us.
Thank you, @a1224143
Rachel - thank you for your great advice. I've been using Canvas for about three years now, and have implemented several of these methods. However, I really like some of your ideas and am going to give some of them a try. I am also going teach a workshop on this topic in January (2020). A student mentioned to me that of all the courses she has in Canvas, my course is the easiest to navigate. That gave me the idea to share some of these ideas with my coworkers at a workshop. If you have additional information you are willing to share to help our students' experience be a more meaningful one. THANK YOU!
@steeletm You'll see me repeat this in various posts and blogs: Whatever navigation choices you make, if you are consistent your students will figure it out much more quickly and successfully.
Your idea of sharing a successful navigation plan with fellow instructors is a good one. The learning curve for user experience is steep and the students suffer the most. (UX Design Puzzles versus Speed )
Teachers new to Canvas can be understandably frustrated ("But why doesn't it work this way?") or have a natural desire to be creative, but Navigation is not the place to get creative. Navigation needs to be utterly predictable!
Even if your course has some navigation problems or dead ends, if you are consistent, students can eventually figure it out. In my experience, if every course is different, the institution looks unprofessional and the general attitude of student trust and optimism toward the teachers starts to erode. Teachers are distracted managing complaints, irritated by the LMS that is supposed to help. No one wants that.
Unpack those Docs! Best Practices for Course Design
saurilio More ideas for schools or instructors who are transitioning to Canvas.
Start with a best practice to prevent cascading errors or maintenance burdens.
It's cool that you design the service so that it is more convenient for students to use the service. I am sometimes surprised by services that help students with homework that have an incomprehensible design. That's why I'm used to using this professional paper writing service https://buypapercheap.net/ right away because this service at least has a clear interface.
To participate in the Instructure Community, you need to sign up or log in:
Sign In
This discussion post is outdated and has been archived. Please use the Community question forums and official documentation for the most current and accurate information.